Archive for July, 2011

inflatable college mascots

Matt Hayes Sporting News

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. — The continuing evolution of Texas’ place in the Big 12 will have far-reaching ramifications — including the most powerful conference in college football.

A source told Sporting News on Wednesday that both Texas A&M and Oklahoma are so concerned about rival Texas gaining a recruiting advantage with the newly formed Longhorn Network, the two institutions could turn to the SEC if the problems can’t be figured out. The core issue: The Longhorn Network will televise live high school football games in the state of Texas, an obvious recruiting advantage for Texas. (Ed. note: The Big 12 announced later Wednesday that those plans had been put on hold.)

Mike Slive has been the SEC’s commissioner since 2002. (AP Photo)

SEC commissioner Mike Slive said Wednesday that he will “continue to do what is in the best interest of the SEC.”

“It is my job to make sure the SEC is the premier league,” Slive said. “For me to exclude any action that would preclude that from happening would be inappropriate.”

Texas A&M and Oklahoma were both in talks with the SEC last summer when Texas was contemplating a move to the Pac-10. The Big 12 eventually made it work in the 11th hour, in part because of heavyweight Texas’ deal to pursue its own television network outside of the league coffers.

Now that the network will include televising high school games in the state of Texas, the dynamics of the Big 12 (and the SEC) could still change. Slive said that he is “comfortable” with the current 12-team SEC, and that it would take a “paradigm shift” for the SEC to expand.

Texas A&M and Oklahoma looking for a new home would be that kind of shift. Moreover, Slive said the SEC’s television deals with CBS and ESPN have clauses that allow them to renegotiate if the conference structure changes.

In other words, adding two teams wouldn’t mean the SEC is dividing the current revenue pie. It would mean, more than anything, completely restructured deals that would likely dwarf the $2 billion-plus the SEC receives from current CBS and ESPN deals.

By Matt Hinton

LSU dodges the NCAA’s wrath, this time, but the bigger target remainsNeither D.J. McCarthy nor Akiem Hicks made much of an enduring impact during their brief tenures at LSU, and for allegedly “major” NCAA violators, they’re not leaving much of one for running afoul of recruiting rules, either. As outlined in a 22-page report released Tuesday afternoon, the Tigers will give up two scholarships, serve one year’s probation and face other minor recruiting restrictions as penance for “major” violations committed by McCarthy, a former wide receivers coach, on behalf of Hicks, a former defensive lineman, in 2009.

In all, LSU was cited for five “major” violations, including charges that McCarthy arranged impermissible lodging and transportation for Hicks during an unofficial campus visit and made nearly two dozen impermissible phone calls to Hicks. The verdict makes it the sixth SEC West program out of six found guilty of “major” violations at some point in the last 20 years.

In this case, the official adjective “major” richly deserves the quotations marks — not only because of the slap on the wrist in response to a series of not-very-shocking allegations, but also because the NCAA actually commended LSU’s compliance department for its efforts to verify Hicks’ living arrangements before it uncovered the violations. Hicks never saw the field and left after the 2009 season; McCarthy “resigned” at the end of that season, and took the brunt of the damage in today’s report in the form of a show-cause penalty for unethical behavior. (More specifically, for concealing the existence of a second phone to make recruiting calls that could not be tracked by LSU and for allegedly lying to the NCAA about Hicks’ housing arrangement during interviews.) His major college coaching career is effectively over, but the Tiger compliance office has proven again the benefits of cooperation. In the end, the NCAA largely accepted the milder sanctions suggested by the university.

For LSU, the sanctions themselves are far less ominous than the implications for the immediate future. The program is currently facing more scrutiny from the NCAA over a $6,000 payment it made to one Willie Lyles, the Houston-based scout who was paid a whopping $25,000 by Oregon for a shoddy, out-of-date scouting report he claims was meant to cover for the Ducks’ efforts to improperly exploit his influence with several key recruits. Now, it’s answering those questions as a program already on probation for a “major” violation.

To be fair, Lyles hasn’t accused LSU of trying to buy his influence, and unlike Oregon, the recruiting materials he sold LSU appear to be legitimate. For its part, LSU doesn’t seem very concerned, Willie Lyles-wise. But we are in NCAA Land, where the proverbial ham sandwich can be sold as a “representative of athletic interests” of a recruit if necessary, and a $6,000 payment to said representative can conceivably bring down the hammer — and bring it down significantly harder on a school classified as a repeat offender. The Tigers may have avoided real damage at the hands of D.J. McCarthy, but they’re not out of the woods yet.

- – -
Matt Hinton is on Twitter: Follow him @DrSaturday.

By Amy Daughters (Texas Tech Featured Columnist) on July 17, 2011

Georgia may well be the team on this list with the most recent success (other than Iowa) but when, oh when, will they win it all?

And by “all” I mean the BCS National Championship, which is obviously the very realistic goal of top tier SEC teams, a goal that has eluded the Bulldogs but not five of the 12 SEC teams in the BCS era.

Georgia has won the SEC East three times since 2000; winning the SEC crown two of these times but perfection and the biggest game in the land (the BCS championship) seems just out of reach.

Their positioning in the SEC East makes things (at least in the last couple of seasons) somewhat easier (relatively) but Georgia seems to losing rather than building momentum.

This is probably the team with the most overall potential on this list (they have it all, including the best shrubs in college football) and though they play in the SEC why can’t they (like brethren Florida, LSU, Alabama, Tennessee and Auburn) run the tables and win it all?

Georgia bulldogs t-shirt

Well, I’m just saying, if I was a Georgia fan, I’d be frustrated (and not just with the six win finish in 2010).

Bleacher report has the other 10 teams

Posted by Ben Kercheval on July 15, 2011, 6:12 PM EDT
sean bedford
When it was announced that Georgia Tech was on the receiving end of a top-secret
NCAA investigation,needless to say (but we’ll do it anyway), it caught everybody off guard.

That includes several former players from that 2009 Yellow Jackets squad who will now
be a part of a vacated ACC title.

Former center Sean Bedford took to his Facebook page today and wrote a rather nasty letter
to the NCAA regarding their decision.

Granted, it wasn’t really a letter in the traditional sense; more of a complaint
via a social media platform.

Anyway, below is Beford’s rant:

Dear NCAA,

Thank you for handing down penalties that only adversely affect the players
who did things the right way. This reeks of an organization desperate to prove that it
has some sort of control over its member institutions despite lacking the ability and
firepower to police the serious offenders and protect the student-athletes
whose interests you purport to have at heart.

While I realize that all violations merit some kind of punishment, I have a hard time
grasping the notion that one of the proudest moments in my life (and the lives of every
other individual that was a part of the team and program in 2009) is apparently worth $312
in your eyes. If that truly is the case, I’d be happy to provide you with that same amount of money
(cash or check, your choice) in exchange for the reinstatement of the title my teammates
and I earned through our blood, sweat and tears.

It took months of hard work, dedication and personal sacrifice by a team
of over 100 players, 10 coaches and countless staff members to achieve that championship,
but, evidently, it only takes the handful of pencil pushers, lawyers and professors on
your infractions committee to strip us of it.

I was a part of the 2009 ACC Championship team and, while you can pretend retroactively
that it didn’t happen, I have vivid memories of an incredible season that was, and continues
to be, one of the most fun, meaningful, important, and very real times in my 23 years on
this planet. I’ll be wearing my championship ring with pride and if you want that too,
you’ll have to pry it from my cold, dead finger.

Sincerely,

Sean Bedford

That last line — awesome.

The Atlanta Journal Constitution also offers up some additional thoughts from former
Yellow Jackets via their Twitter accounts:

Demaryius Thomas, former receiver: Swear they look for anything.

Phil Smith, current offensive lineman: They can’t strip me of my memories.

Sedric Griffin, former linebacker: Can’t win for losing as a Techie.

Mario Butler, former cornerback: Regardless of what happened I still got my acc ring.

Anthony Allen, former running back: Well good thing my ring is in a safe place but this is some bull…

Brad Jefferson, former linebacker:  Just heard they so called, “took our acc championship away,”
dats funny..lol! Take something away from gladiator(ha), YEA RIGHT! All they can say is that they tried…

Scott Blair, former kicker: We beat Clemson twice in 2009. We only needed to beat them once to prove
we were the best in the ACC anyway.

Posted by John Taylor (NBC) on July 14, 2011, 5:42 PM EDT
Richard SamuelOver the course of the past two months or so, Georgia has watched as their leading rusher from the past two seasons, Washaun Ealey, left the football program as well as Caleb King declaring for the NFL’s supplemental draft after being ruled academically ineligible for the 2011 season.

Those twin departures created a bit of a hole in the depth chart behind true freshman and presumptive running game workhorse Isaiah Crowell.  Today, the program announced a move aimed at filling the holes at the running back position created this offseason.

In a release, UGA announced that linebacker Richard Samuel has been moved from the defensive side back to the offensive backfield.  Samuel was a tailback as a freshman (2008) and sophomore (2009), but moved to linebacker last year due in part to the switch to a 3-4 defense.  He did not play in 2010 because of an injury and took a redshirt.

Now, if/when he plays in 2011, it will be at the position he played upon arriving in Athens.

“After discussions with Richard, his family, and our coaches I’m excited that Richard wants to make the move,” said head coach Mark Richt in a statement. “He’s one of our fastest and most powerful players, is very mature, has a strong character and is a man we can count on. I¹m proud of him for always putting the team first and I look forward to seeing what he can do.”

“I’m excited about the opportunity at tailback,” said Samuel. “I’m ready to do anything that will help the team win.”

During his two years as a RB at UGA, Samuel rushed for 528 yards — on 114 carries — and three touchdowns. He played in 22 games, starting six of those contests.

NCAA Slams Georgia Tech with Probation

Georgia Tech was fined $100,000 by the NCAA, stripped of its 2009 ACC championship in football and placed on four years of probation on Thursday for failure to cooperate with its investigation into the football and men’s basketball programs.

Those weren’t the only penalties, which stemmed from what the NCAA described as an isolated instance of former standout  wide receiver Demaryius Thomas allegedly receiving $312 in impermissible gifts, and grew to Morgan Burnett allegedly taking gifts and misleading NCAA investigators. Both have denied taking improper benefits.

In addition, more penalties were self-imposed and accepted by the NCAA:

  • Public reprimand and censure.
  • Four years of probation from July 14, 2011 through July 13, 2015. The public report further details the conditions of this probation.
  • A reduction of two men’s basketball recruiting days during the 2011 summer evaluation period (self-imposed by the university).
  • A limit of 10 official visits for men’s basketball for the 2011-12 and 2012-13 academic years.
  • A vacation of all contests won by the football team during the 2009 season after November 24. The ACC said Tech must return the trophy. No champion for the season will be named.

The committee stated in its report, “This case provides a cautionary tale of conduct that member institutions should avoid while under investigation for violations of NCAA rules.” It said Tech’s previous history of violations factored into its punishment decisions. After receiving penalties for the 2005 and ‘06 seasons for infractions that occurred in the 1990s, the NCAA said that if Tech committed another major infraction before Nov. 17, 2010, it would be subject to added penalties as a repeat violator.

Within the investigation, the NCAA noted the combative and confrontational attitude of general counsel, Randy Nordin. He retired in December. Paul Parker, formerly the assistant athletics director at compliance, left in April to take a job with Auburn.

The case started when Tech learned that Thomas, received clothing from a friend of someone who worked for an sports agent. Burnett and former player Calvin Booker attended the meeting when Thomas received the clothing. Burnett didn’t receive anything.

Athletics Director Dan Radakovich told coach Paul Johnson about the investigation into Thomas receiving improper benefits, but didn’t inform him that he shouldn’t talk to Burnett about the investigation. The NCAA said that conversation hindered its investigation.

The NCAA noted that Tech continued to allow one of the players to compete in the final three games of the 2009-10 football season, in which Tech won the ACC and played in the Orange Bowl, despite the NCAA notifying the school that it had questions about the eligibility of that player. Dennis Thomas, the head of the Infractions Committee, said Tech had enough information to warrant not using the player until it could investigate the players’ eligibility. Tech President Dr. G.P. “Bud” Peterson made the decision to allow both to play.

“It appeared to the committee that the institution attempted to manipulate the information surrounding potential violations involving (the student-athlete) so there would be enough doubt about its validity to justify the decision not to declare him ineligible,” the NCAA said in its report.

The committee also noted “the university took these actions despite information reported by the student-athlete, another football student-athlete and an assistant football coach regarding the potential agent involvement in preferential treatment benefits.” Tech barred Booker from the university’s training facilities and denied him access to complimentary tickets to athletic contests.

Thomas denied that he was one of the reasons for the investigation. In a text message, Thomas said he was offered things by people not affiliated with Tech, but never accepted. Burnett, a safety and third-round pick, also denied the report, texting that he “did not knowingly or unknowingly receive any gifts from any agents … These reports are baseless and false.”

Thomas and Burnett signed with Tech when Chan Gailey was the coach. Paul Johnson, who led Tech to the ACC title in 2009, was hired after Gailey was fired by Radakovich after the 2007 season after five years at the helm.

It is the second time in six years that Tech has been penalized by the NCAA. It learned in 2003 that it had been misapplying an NCAA eligibility rule and worked with the NCAA to investigate the nature and results of the error. They learned that 17 athletes, including 11 football players, who were academically ineligible were allowed to compete during the 1998 and ‘99 seasons.

As a result, Georgia Tech was on a two-year probation that resulted in self-imposed scholarship cuts (from 85 to 79) and a reduction in signing classes (from 25 to no more than 19) in 2005 and 2006. In addition to those penalties, the NCAA infractions committee added a limit of 79 total football scholarships for the 2006 and 2007 teams, six below the normal maximum.

The infractions committee also recommended that Tech vacate wins from seasons, 1998-2002, plus 2004, which were all winning seasons that ended in bowl trips. Tech appealed and the NCAA appeals committee agreed, allowing the results of those seasons to stand.

The NCAA has been in what appears to be a testy mood regarding alleged violations and lack of cooperation in wake of scandals at Ohio State, Southern California and North Carolina, among other places. The Trojans were forced by the NCAA to forfeit their 2004 national championship and the Buckeyes voluntarily forfeited 12 wins and their 2010 Sugar Bowl victory in an attempt to appease the infractions committee. Penalties against North Carolina’s program haven’t been announced. However, numerous players were suspended for all or parts of last season.

Please keep checking back for news.

– Doug Roberson, AJC. Follow on twitter @ajcgatech

  • Partner links